I received a couple of DMs a few days ago asking why I’d used the spelling “womxn” in a previous post and whether it was a typo! The short answer is: no, it wasn’t!
Firstly, I’d like to make it clear that no one HAS to use “womxn” rather than “woman/women.” Of course, the traditional spelling, “woman,” can apply to anyone who identifies this way! However, as I’m about to explain, using the “x” signals inclusivity in a way that the traditional spelling does not. This makes it extremely clear, so that no one has to wonder whether or not they are included when someone uses the word! In acknowledgement of the feminist movement’s history of exclusivity and white feminism, I am always aiming to do better! Now, let’s jump in! As I mentioned, the spelling “womxn” is intentionally inclusive. Olivia Romero, the co-founder of Pikes Peak Womxn for Liberation, says, “the spelling of ‘womxn’ is meant to show inclusion of trans, nonbinary, womxn of color, womxn with disabilities, and all other marginalized genders” The spelling “womxn” also breaks free from linguistic and patriarchal norms by removing the suffixes “-man” and “-men,” indicating the denial to be defined by a man. To summarize, it avoids using the spelling “women,” which contains and derives from “men,” to label any woman who has historically been excluded. By using this spelling, feminists communicate safety. With us, your gender will be respected, your pronouns used correctly, and your voice considered with equal weight. In fact, this spelling is yet another indicator of how the feminist movement has become increasingly intersectional in its third and fourth waves, and it continues to strive to be inclusive of all identities. We accept you as you are.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Neha SaggiFounder and director of LeadHERship. Archives
March 2021
Categories |